[align=center]
Fossil Gaps 4a
[/align]

??But the curious thing is that there is a consistency about the fossil gaps: the fossils go missing in all the important places. When you look for links between major groups of animals, they simply aren??t there; at least, not in enough numbers to put their status beyond doubt. Either they don??t exist at all, or they are so rare that endless argument goes on about whether a particular fossil is, or isn??t, or might be, transitional between this group or that.? Hitching, p. 19.

??There is no more conclusive refutation of Darwinism than that furnished by palaeontology. Simple probability indicates that fossil hoards can only be test samples. Each sample, then, should represent a different stage of evolution, and there ought to be merely ??transitional?? types, no definition and no species. Instead of this we find perfectly stable and unaltered forms persevering through long ages, forms that have not developed themselves on the fitness principle, but appear suddenly and at once in their definitive shape; that do not thereafter evolve towards better adaptation, but become rarer and finally disappear, while quite different forms crop up again. What unfolds itself, in ever-increasing richness of form, is the great classes and kinds of living beings which exist aboriginally and exist still, without transition types, in the grouping of today.? Oswald Spengler, The Decline of the West, Vol. 2 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1966), p. 32.

In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood - 23. Fossil Gaps