Quote Originally Posted by Pahu78
THE LAWS OF THERMODYNAMICS

The first law of thermodynamics says that the actual amount or energy in the universe remains constantâ??it doesn't change. The second law of thermodynamics says that the amount of usable energy in any closed system (which the whole universe is) is decreasing. Everything is tending toward disorder and the universe is running down. Now if the overall amount of energy stays the same, but we are running out of usable energy, then what we started with was not an infinite amount: You can't run out of an infinite amount. This means that the universe is and always has been finite. It could not have existed forever in the past and will not exist forever into the future. So it must have had a beginning.

[From When Skeptics Ask by Geisler & Brooks]


It's a balancing act OF infinity.


there is just less infinite usable energy right now than there is infinite energy users.


it could be said that the effect is going from a 50-50 balance to a 40-60 to a 20-80. when the balance is so far off to the extreme, it reverses polarity and heads back to the other direction. when we hit 100% matter and 0% energy, we will suddenly snap back, everyone will die, and we'll be back at ground 0 again, perfect balance of all the infinite elements.




yes, im rambling nonsense here, but think about it.

the first law of thermodynamics is true circumstance, the second law is circumstantially true.

it's not that we are losing energy so much as it is that more energy is being used. when there is no energy left to be used, the users must then convert back into energy.





let's take a life and death approach.



life is energy user, death is energy creator.


but there is never more or less than 100%, it is just where that % is balanced, and how.
Stoner Shadow Wolf Reviewed by Stoner Shadow Wolf on . Science Disproves Evolution Compatible Senders and Receivers Only intelligence creates codes, programs, and information (CP&I). Each involves senders and receivers. Senders and receivers can be people, animals, plants, organs, cells, or certain molecules. (The DNA molecule is a prolific sender.) The CP&I in a message must be understandable and beneficial to both sender and receiver; otherwise, the effort expended in transmitting and receiving messages (written, chemical, electrical, magnetic, visual, and auditory) will Rating: 5