Meh, 10 minute edit limit beat me...

Psychocat - I really don't want to keep this up - it detracts from the OP, which was the person I was actually disagreeing with. You are clearly an intellectual and I totally know where you are coming from on this. I agree with your standpoint on knowledge and information, especially when it comes to scientific theory. Please don't mistake my confidence for arrogance on this topic.

The key difference here is that the OP lied and tried to use pseudo-science to 'disprove' a very solid theory. Making stuff up to disprove a theory (by counting on the majority of people not being able to tell the difference) is deceptive at best, dangerous at worst and definately not science.

It's like a red rag to a bull. When I see bullshit I will call it.