Science Disproves Evolution

[sonic titan]

Infinity indeed can be crossed. There are shortcuts through infinity, everywhere. Time is only a mind barrier, an illusion. At least in my opinion. What is all this talk of impossibilities? Any/every thing is possible, it just takes the right perspective.

"Anything is possible
Believe in a wish and it'll come true

Everything is delightful
There's nothing frightful
In a piece of the world where we make our own rules"

[Delta9 UK]

Here we go again.... This post is so ill-informed I could cry.

Why do Creationists sorry, ID supporters keep copying and pasting rubbish that they don't even understand themselves?

This is a science forum, for - well y'know - Science.

Read all about the Transition you claim never happened...

"Although Archaeopteryx is by far the best-known of the transitional fossils, it is not the only one, or even the best. The fossil transition from reptile to mammal is one of the most extensive and well-studied of all the transitions, and detailed series of fossils demonstrate how this transition was accomplished. It is not, therefore, surprising that the creationists do not talk much about the reptile-mammal series, and when they do, most of what they say is demonstrably untrue."

Read the whole thing:

http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaver...7/therapsd.htm

[Delta9 UK]

Another religion versus evolution argument that neither side can ever prove beyond all doubt.

I don't know about that! to be honest, pretty much everything this guy posted was Horseshit and readily disproven tbh.

The thing is, like most of the ID crowd he doesn't even understand what he's copy-pasting. That's what makes these arguments so bloody annoying.

Once you start to get somewhere they go and get themselves banned or just vanish once you prove everything they said/posted is toss.

[psychocat]

I don't know about that! to be honest, pretty much everything this guy posted was Horseshit and readily disproven tbh.

The thing is, like most of the ID crowd he doesn't even understand what he's copy-pasting. That's what makes these arguments so bloody annoying.

Once you start to get somewhere they go and get themselves banned or just vanish once you prove everything they said/posted is toss.

Can you prove either beyond any doubt ?
I would be interested to see anyone try.
The man who thinks he has found the truth will seek no further.

[Delta9 UK]

Can you prove either beyond any doubt ?
I would be interested to see anyone try.
The man who thinks he has found the truth will seek no further.

I can prove everything this guy posted is pseudo-science and not true - so, erm - YES!

in fact it looks like posted the same crap here:
Science Disproves Evolution - sci.physics | Google Groups

and was rightly WTFPWNED

[psychocat]

I can prove everything this guy posted is pseudo-science and not true - so, erm - YES!

in fact it looks like posted the same crap here:
Science Disproves Evolution - sci.physics | Google Groups

and was rightly WTFPWNED

Disproving anothers theory does not prove your own.

[Delta9 UK]

Disproving anothers theory does not prove your own.

Which is EXACTLY what he was trying to do.

I'm not trying to disprove his theory - he doesn't have one, he's just attacking evolution and doing a poor job to boot.

[psychocat]

Which is EXACTLY what he was trying to do.

I'm not trying to disprove his theory - he doesn't have one, he's just attacking evolution and doing a poor job to boot.

You're kind of missing the point.
I asked "can you prove the theory of evolution beyond doubt" ?
You claimed that by disproving his theory you were proving your own.

[daihashi]

You're kind of missing the point.
I asked "can you prove the theory of evolution beyond doubt" ?
You claimed that by disproving his theory you were proving your own.

I'm having a similar discussion in politics.

I personally don't believe in creationism but I don't deny the possibility. People are either going to be open minded and say "it may be possible" or staunchly say no that it's wrong.

meh, really when it comes down to it no one with all certainty can prove 100% that either side is right.

It just so happens though that science is winning the battle.

[Delta9 UK]

You're kind of missing the point.
I asked "can you prove the theory of evolution beyond doubt" ?
You claimed that by disproving his theory you were proving your own.

No I'm not missing the point, carefully read my posts - at no point did I say disproving ID proved evolution. I said everything he copy-pasted was inaccurate or lies and easily proved false. He is making claims with no basis in fact.

There are mountains of evidence but unfortunately you usually need to study Biology or even have a degree in Genetics to fully comprehend all of it - the ID crowd utilise this situation rather well by spewing pseudo science that the average person can't distinguish from real science.

This isn't just semantics either, creationists lie, deceive and distort - and they do it a lot.

Evolution is a scientific theory - it is falsifiable, makes predictions, and yes I can happily prove it to be true - beyond doubt. Where would you like me to start? Microevolution or Macroevolution? Transitional fossils or Endogenous retroviruses?

Non scientists arguing about science is a recipe for disaster :thumbsup: