Science Disproves Evolution

[Stoner Shadow Wolf]

What higher planes exactly? And what makes you think we have these higher planes?

it's just a label for something we dont yet understand. an idea that there are other dimensions greater and lesser than our own.


a "higher plane" would just mean to say a larger dimension than where our perceptions rest.

[psychocat]

You are now missing the point my friend.

I'm not presuming anything and to be frank your response is insulting and it makes it obvious you don't understand the theory and are not equipped to discuss it beyond your own opinion of science and knowledge as a whole..

Insulting in what way ?
That comment shows a touch of arrogance.
I understand a lot more than you realise

I haven't stopped asking questions - but I have actually studied evolution (along with Genetics and Microbiology). If I had a better idea of how everything works I would have won a Nobel prize by now. Scientists would fall over themselves to prove a theory wrong - that's sort of the whole point of science.

Do you have all the answers ?
I don't think so.

Evolution is a well understood mechanism - it is beyond doubt. Science does actually have all the answers here. Everything in biology has confirmed this - nothing has disputed it. I really thing we are arguing Apples and Oranges here as I suspect your point is more a philosophical approach to human understanding rather than you diagreeing specifically with the theory of evolution - which would be a fallacy.

I disagree , science only has some of the answers , only by further investigation can we ever hope to find those missing answers.

Unanswered Questions about the Evolution of the Early Universe

[Stoner Shadow Wolf]

EGO FIGHT!!!

[psychocat]

EGO FIGHT!!!

LOL

[Stoner Shadow Wolf]

LOL

Psychocat Wins! or something, i dunno... you have a pretty powerful ego though, but my egopenis is bigger!

[psychocat]

Psychocat Wins! or something, i dunno... you have a pretty powerful ego though, but my egopenis is bigger!

I'm not really that interested in winning anything but I do take great exception to being told I am incapable of understanding something by someone who has no idea of what I am capable of.
I know what I know and what I don't know I admit to.
There are many areas of my (limited) knowledge I would like to improve and I find open discussion to be a good way to get a different view.
I will admit to playing devils advocate purely for the hell of it sometimes.

At the end of the day it's all about opinions and we know that opinions are like arseholes....... we all have one. :thumbsup:

BTW
I like your humour Wolfie. :jointsmile:

[Stoner Shadow Wolf]

I'm not really that interested in winning anything but I do take great exception to being told I am incapable of understanding something by someone who has no idea of what I am capable of.
I know what I know and what I don't know I admit to.
There are many areas of my (limited) knowledge I would like to improve and I find open discussion to be a good way to get a different view.
I will admit to playing devils advocate purely for the hell of it sometimes.

At the end of the day it's all about opinions and we know that opinions are like arseholes....... we all have one. :thumbsup:

BTW
I like your humour Wolfie. :jointsmile:

My humor likes you back... should i set up a date or something? :giggity:

haha ok nevermind, my humor doesnt want to get into a relationship just yet.

ok im done... lol

[Delta9 UK]

I'm not really that interested in winning anything but I do take great exception to being told I am incapable of understanding something by someone who has no idea of what I am capable of.

Bullshit - I never said that - I said I understand it. I didn't say anything about you being incapable of understanding it - I just said you obviously haven't studied it - there is a BIG difference. Careful with what you write - I get it to read it afterwards and everything...

I'm sure you are capable of understanding it - a 10 year old can understand it. You just don't seem able to apply any understanding of it to this 'discussion'.

I know what I know and what I don't know I admit to.
There are many areas of my (limited) knowledge I would like to improve and I find open discussion to be a good way to get a different view.
I will admit to playing devils advocate purely for the hell of it sometimes.

Well you have a funny idea of open discussion - playing Devils Advocate here is just stupid. Remember the OP - remember what we are even discussing? Go ahead and Play Devils Advocate - but what is your point exactly?

Is your point: Science doesn't have all the answers to everything? Well YES I couldn't agree more.

But we aren't talking about Everything are we - NO, we are talking about Biological Evolution, well I am at least. As far as that is concerned Biology really does have all the answers.

At the end of the day it's all about opinions and we know that opinions are like arseholes....... we all have one. :thumbsup:

Well I'm out of here, I couldn't give a toss if you want to argue about something that has fuck all to do with the original post. Play devils advocate all you like on your own. You can keep your opinion(s) they are a poor substitute to logic.

I'm talking about Biological evolution - what the hell has that to do with how the universe was created. That's the bit where we both departed from the same course. I was pretty sure you were moving in that direction early on, I just didn't come out and say it - hence my Apples and Oranges comment.

For example with this link:
Unanswered Questions about the Evolution of the Early Universe

WTF has the above link got to do with the theory of Evolution? We aren't even on the same page Mate. I'm done with this pointless argument it sucks when I KNOW you are an intellectual and you just want to pick a fight over something.

[Delta9 UK]

Meh, 10 minute edit limit beat me...

Psychocat - I really don't want to keep this up - it detracts from the OP, which was the person I was actually disagreeing with. You are clearly an intellectual and I totally know where you are coming from on this. I agree with your standpoint on knowledge and information, especially when it comes to scientific theory. Please don't mistake my confidence for arrogance on this topic.

The key difference here is that the OP lied and tried to use pseudo-science to 'disprove' a very solid theory. Making stuff up to disprove a theory (by counting on the majority of people not being able to tell the difference) is deceptive at best, dangerous at worst and definately not science.

It's like a red rag to a bull. When I see bullshit I will call it.

[Stoner Shadow Wolf]

Double Whammy! Delta9 takes the lead! wait i thought this was a fight, not an ego race :S oh well... TOUCHDOWN!