One Large Step!!!!!!!!

[flyingimam]

I'm no legal-eagle but I'd imagine the precedent set by the outcome will make a huge difference for pending and future cases.

THIS IS in fact the main point in such a case if succeeded

if 1 case can be proven, it will become the model case and will be used a million times after for similar rulings and/or situations

i cross my fingers on this one!:smokin:

[SnSstealth]

As I get more updates from ASA, i will post em...thanks for reading guys!! The fight gets closer!!
whiskeytango

[Storm Crow]

And is upheld, and Arnie signs that MMJ employee protection bill, Granny's going to have to be VERY CAREFUL!







Turning cartwheels at my age can be dangerous! lol - Granny :hippy:

[killerweed420]

So these people were operating a "collective", hmm. I especially love the part where "helos were circling over head"! Fucking A man!:thumbsup:

Also noticed this is a "civil" lawsuit. I have searched and searched but have yet to find info on trial dates ect.... any help anyone would be greatly appreciated!

If this is just a civil case it won't have as much meaning. It will allow collectives to sue and recover costs from the DEA but won't stop them.

[Opie Yutts]

Better than nothing. OK maybe it's not a large step, but it's pretty big compared to what has been going on.

It's coming...

[theforthdrive]

If this is just a civil case it won't have as much meaning. It will allow collectives to sue and recover costs from the DEA but won't stop them.

I agree but hitting a govt agency in the pocket effects their bottom line. They will at least think twice about raids. A presidential order could also stop the DEA from entering bank! Money is a big issue these days! but what do I know Im sure the DEA has more money to wait out a lawsuit than most banks would! Its a crappy world!

And is upheld, and Arnie signs that MMJ employee protection bill, Granny's going to have to be VERY CAREFUL!

I always wondered that... do the employees face punishment for having a job or do they just lose their job?

[GoddessHerb]

It's a step in the right direction but I think the Raich case is more important. If the Raich case is upheld in the Supreme Court then it could open the door to complete legalization on a state by state basis. Now that is HUGE!!!:jointsmile:

If drugs are illegal on a federal level through interstate commerce then keep it intrastate commerce and you don't break federal law right? As long as you can keep supply and demand within the state then the feds can't touch you. Period.

Somebody tell me if I'm way off here because I'm high or if this really makes sense :hippy:

Blessed be ~

[Opie Yutts]

As long as you can keep supply and demand within the state then the feds can't touch you. Period.

It seems that somebody forgot to tell that to the feds.

[GoddessHerb]

It seems that somebody forgot to tell that to the feds.

"If they think it's the law and they have all the guns..." And that's an authoritarian approach. So much for freedom. :sadcrying

[Storm Crow]

"If drugs are illegal on a federal level through interstate commerce then keep it intrastate commerce and you don't break federal law right?"

Wrong! Although logic would seem to dictate that you would be OK, the Supremes saw it another way. They said basically that if you grew wheat for your OWN use, it interfered with interstate commerce, therefore it could be regulated. This covers it.

One Radical Opinion | Medical Marijuana and States Rights

Doesn't make sense to me either! But then, neither does MMJ prohibition!


BB

Granny :hippy: