Parts of site failed to load... If you are using an ad blocker addon, you should to disable it (it blocks more than ads and causes parts of the site to not work).
The earth that we live on is just a small rock in this constantly expanding universe.
If you fly into Los Angeles. You go over all of the beautiful fields and mountains, then all of a sudden you see LA and all of that disgusting pollution. If you looked at the earth as a living organism you would look at LA and you'd think (thats CANCER). Well I think that is our purpose as human beings. Much like mold takes over a sandwich. I think thats what people do. I think we are just a more complicated form of bacteria. And all of the thoughts of ourselves are just biological tricks set up to keep the human race alive and perpetuating.
thoughts? :stoned:
Bacteria doesn't cause cancer. Cancer is mutated genes that cause unregulated cell division/growth. So i don't see your connection :P
... but seriously did anyone watch Joe Rogan say the exact same thing as the OP in the youtube video? Just find it strange... maybe Joe is a member here :hippy:
Originally Posted by Billionfold
We're not a virus or bacteria, we're simply highly intelligent mammals.
It's nice to think of humans as really smart and refined... but intelligence is really a relative term. Subjective? Hmm... what word? It's based on perspective. Yeah, we can build fancy stuff and dial phones... but I doubt we could survive many environments that so called "stupid" mammals can thrive in. We base intelligence off of our survival skills, so it is somewhat impossible to compare our ability to articulate a sentence with a bats ability to navigate at high speeds in pitch black. Even in humans we have different forms of intelligence (Street smart vs. Book smart:hippy so even WE can't really compare "intelligence." Does that make sense? It's late...
Originally Posted by Billionfold
1,000 years ago we weren't causing pollution, so how could we be bacteria if we haven't been that way for the entire time we've been kickin'?
My only explanation for this would be, again, because we are basing things off of our perception. We are partial to "our way of life." Our idea of linear time would not translate to a viral colony. While we may think of humans only being a destructive force on Earth for a short period of time... some may argue that as soon as man set foot on the Earth... it began the viral destruction of the planet.
It's like... you see the moldy sandwich. It may have started with one little mold spore... left to reproduce, it grows. After a week or so... most of the sandwich has a light coating of mold, but still it looks like a sandwich. Nothing to get too worried about. Now if you let it go for like a month... that shit will start to decompose and rot, eventually becoming unrecognizable.
Now imagine the world is the sandwich... the single spore was the first people on Earth... the light coating of mold was the growing global population... and once the mold dominates everything... it is game over for the sandwich. This also would happen over a very very very long time.
So, you throw that whole humanly subjective term "time" out the window... and we really aren't that different from a moldy sandwich :stoned:
Does that makes sense? It's late...
Edit:Let me also say, after seeing the above post ^... I believe this is used more as a metaphor than as an actual medical correlation.
all that exists is nothing more than a(nother) representation of all that exists.
You can see all of creation in a grain of sand. everything is made up of the same thing, and is only re-represented to the infinite decimal, thus creating what we see as "time", for not all representations can exist simultaneously in the same "place" and "time".
It's nice to think of humans as really smart and refined... but intelligence is really a relative term. Subjective? Hmm... what word? It's based on perspective. Yeah, we can build fancy stuff and dial phones... but I doubt we could survive many environments that so called "stupid" mammals can thrive in. We base intelligence off of our survival skills, so it is somewhat impossible to compare our ability to articulate a sentence with a bats ability to navigate at high speeds in pitch black. Even in humans we have different forms of intelligence (Street smart vs. Book smart:hippy so even WE can't really compare "intelligence." Does that make sense? It's late...
Yes, it does makes sense. To elaborate, those "stupid" other mammals (and many other living things on this planet) have found their place in this world without destroying the balance. I think when arguing smarts that should be taken into consideration.
I just think humans are a bunch of self-important arseholes. No other species is so singularly self-destructive on the levels that we are. It's downright shameful. I think our reign at the top of the food chain will eventually need balancing out if we are to extend the length of our stay on earth's massive time line. No species can carry on the way we are without some serious adjustments.
It's nice to think of humans as really smart and refined... but intelligence is really a relative term. Subjective? Hmm... what word? It's based on perspective. Yeah, we can build fancy stuff and dial phones... but I doubt we could survive many environments that so called "stupid" mammals can thrive in. We base intelligence off of our survival skills, so it is somewhat impossible to compare our ability to articulate a sentence with a bats ability to navigate at high speeds in pitch black. Even in humans we have different forms of intelligence (Street smart vs. Book smart:hippy so even WE can't really compare "intelligence." Does that make sense? It's late...
Yes, it does makes sense. To elaborate, those "lesser" other mammals (and many other living things on this planet) have found their place in this world without destroying the balance. I think when arguing smarts that should be taken into consideration.
I just think humans are a bunch of self-important arseholes. No other species is so singularly self-destructive on the levels that we are. It's downright shameful. I think our reign at the top of the food chain (in a matter of speaking) will eventually need balancing out if we are to extend the length of our stay on earth's massive time line. No species can carry on the way we are without some serious adjustments.
if going by religious accounts, Noah came, a vast area of what was then inhabited world-if not the whole world by other accounts- got flooded to the point only his ship survived the storm and then back at square 1 in no time, maybe the surviving humans dont act like viruses for a generation or so... we are "made" to act like that one way or another... and as soon as 1 starts acting like that it will just be a ripple effect and others will follow suit!
Floods? Ill be safe on my friend 110 ft. Sea Line Boat.
Yes, it does makes sense. To elaborate, those "lesser" other mammals (and many other living things on this planet) have found their place in this world without destroying the balance. I think when arguing smarts that should be taken into consideration.
I just think humans are a bunch of self-important arseholes. No other species is so singularly self-destructive on the levels that we are. It's downright shameful. I think our reign at the top of the food chain (in a matter of speaking) will eventually need balancing out if we are to extend the length of our stay on earth's massive time line. No species can carry on the way we are without some serious adjustments.
Humanity has always managed to leave me feeling ashamed and pissed off... when you look at the balance of nature, it is SO beautiful it ALMOST makes one forget how shitty humanity's impact on the world is...
We are so self destructive indeed, on a level of thought that i cannot ascribe words to... AND i just lost that thought, so go ahead and disregard that :P
Humanity has always managed to leave me feeling ashamed and pissed off... when you look at the balance of nature, it is SO beautiful it ALMOST makes one forget how shitty humanity's impact on the world is...
We are so self destructive indeed, on a level of thought that i cannot ascribe words to... AND i just lost that thought, so go ahead and disregard that :P
True humans really are destructive creatures..
Its crazy to think.. there are more stars in space than grains of sand on the earth.. and stars and million times bigger than the earth.. we are only alive because of our proximity to a tiny burning star called "THE SUN" that gives us energy to live and have LIFE.
When you start thinking this way.. makes you feel very tiny in this huge universe :jointsmile:
Its crazy to think.. there are more stars in space than grains of sand on the earth.. and stars and million times bigger than the earth.. we are only alive because of our proximity to a tiny burning star called "THE SUN" that gives us energy to live and have LIFE.
When you start thinking this way.. makes you feel very tiny in this huge universe :jointsmile:
With all known scientific evidence, humans are the only species on the earth that can bring about their own extinction. And with the leaders running the world today, the escalator is moving in that direction. Maybe that's what the earth needs to recover itself, the extinction of its worst threat. Us. :jointsmile:
The earth that we live on is just a small rock in this constantly expanding universe.
If you fly into Los Angeles. You go over all of the beautiful fields and mountains, then all of a sudden you see LA and all of that disgusting pollution. If you looked at the earth as a living organism you would look at LA and you'd think (thats CANCER). Well I think that is our purpose as human beings. Much like mold takes over a sandwich. I think thats what people do. I think we are just a more complicated form of bacteria. And all of the thoughts of ourselves are just biological tricks set up to keep the human race alive and perpetuating.
thoughts? :stoned:
So true.....flying into LAX looks like flying into Beijing China on most days. Nasty.
Humans are a insignificant speck of nothing on this giant planet.