I don't think there should be any limits. By limiting the planting of this herb, we foster the illegal market in it. Organized crime goes where the money is. Eliminate the profit and they find something else to do.

So a person grows 200 plants...after the first year, who will he sell to? And what price will he get after every granny has a couple of plants tucked away in the rose garden? Prices are going to drop like a lead balloon! :thumbsup:

Those people who use edibles, also may require more than those who vaporize or smoke. My husband gets far better pain relief from edibles.

In addition, there will be many who will wish to try Mr. Simpson's "Phoenix oil". More than 1 out of every 3 people will get cancer. (Do a search on "Run from the Cure"). To make the oil requires massive amounts of cannabis. To make a 2 to 3 month supply of "Phoenix Oil", you start with an almost full 5 gallon bucket of cannabis! A year's supply would take about 25 to 30 gallons of cannabis! I think that is a bit more than most folks get off their California legal "6 mature plants"!

Clearly, any limits on the number of cannabis plants should, if it must be limited, be between a patient and their doctor. Only a doctor can say if 6 plants, or 600 plants, are appropriate for any particular patient. Law enforcement should have no say in medical treatments, herbal or otherwise!

Granny:hippy:
Storm Crow Reviewed by Storm Crow on . CA: State top court to review medical pot limit The state Supreme Court returned to the medical marijuana wars Wednesday, agreeing to decide the validity of a law that shields doctor-approved pot users from arrest for possessing up to eight ounces of dried marijuana or growing six plants. The justices voted unanimously to review the issue after a prosecution appeal of a lower-court ruling in May. In that ruling, an appellate court found the 2003 law conflicted with California's 1996 medical marijuana initiative, which allows possession of Rating: 5