It says you got some reps from people who either liked the discussion itself or were themselves as misogynistic as you are. You got twice as many negative comments in response here on the thread itself and got those from people of both genders, so the negative reaction you received still far outweighs the positive. The ones who liked it and agreed with it weren't brave enough to post that up front, and they were probably wise not to do so.

I just reread your original thread and again marveled at the offensiveness of the "swift punch in the jaw" comment. You cannot see that because it came from an attitude in your head, but you also don't get the concept of chivalry as courtesy, clearly. One thing's for sure, those men who don't see the value of chivalry are never going to fall into the category that women regard as sexy. Not because of some fantasy of knighthood. That's silliness that people on the outside looking in read into that term. Intelligent women can take care of themselves. It's sexy because the courtesy/chivalry that shows on the surface translates to someone who, in intimate situations, goes out of his way to, well, satisfy. That's why it's sexy to see a man who is courteous/chivalrous and an immediate turnoff when he's not. I'm pretty sure that's also why you're not meeting women! They're looking past you at the ones who aim to please.