Quote Originally Posted by SteveV

"I explained how I arrived at 10 years."

Yes, and I explained how that is ridiculous.
No you didn't. You said -

Quote Originally Posted by SteveV
Latest lie: "This, combined with the 5 year reduction Ms Corby won at appeal, brought me to my earlier estimate of 10 years."

The 20 year sentence was re-imposed at a later appeal. FACT. Even Wikipedia is right on that one. Check ANY site that describes this case in fact. You clearly know next to nothing about it.

She also lost her remission rights on the pretext of a cellphone in her cell. The real reason is almost certainly her book.
How does that actually refute my initial assessment of the situation?

Quote Originally Posted by sarah louise
Schapelle's only risk of dying in Bali will be dying from self pity. She has a lot to be sorry for though, she would have done 10 years after her sentence was lightened to 15 (with remission bonuses for xmas, birthdays and good behaviour) but stupidity has already blown it back out to 20 years. If people want to give money to couriers who get snatched, there are other Australian's actually facing the death penalty in Indonesia.
You clipped 6 words out of a longer sentence, dropped my conclusion and then said I was lying because wikipedia said effectively the same things as my conclusion. Now you suggest I am the one who is dodging things.

Quote Originally Posted by SteveV
She continues to twist and turn to campaign to hurt Schapelle Corby further.
Can you explain where I have twisted or turned?

I don't mind if you want to use wikipedia to reference public record, or even other cannabis activism/politics forums/blogs etc to gauge audience response, so long as you identify them and they provide evidence of checkable sources.

Quote Originally Posted by SteveV
And more smears, innuendo, this time against me: "Are you still pretending to be some dude who found this stuff on the internet and was appalled?".
No, it's just a question. You could have answered it with a yes or a no. I am not responsible for what you decide my words mean.

But back my question about the veracity of the website link in your first post.

How do you know that the donation link leads to a legitimate site?

How do you know this particular paypal account hasn't been set up to profit from people's sympathy?

What steps did you take to verify for yourself that it wasn't a scam?

Where is the information about the auditing of accounts available?