Here we go again: yet another tangent, yet another steer away from the real issues. More smears (against me this time) rather than on-topic debate. Pathetic.


They refused to test the evidence. Why would a real court do that? If she really did it, hey, her prints and DNA might be on it!

And hey, the drugs might just have been from Aussie rather than an Indonesian plant!

So why not test them as Schapelle asked? Why not? They could have nailed her, surely!

But they KNEW her prints could not be there and the drugs were not imported.

And so they burned them instead.


The issues. Remember them?

When you can't argue with them, it is a lot easier to smear people, isn't it?