Oh enough with the slander and libel accusations. You have so much to prove such as malicious intent and trying to present things as fact when they are clearly false and that opinions formed and stated are so far from the truth that only someone who was out to defame an individual could come up with these opinions from the facts. Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't make it libel or slander and since she has been convicted of a crime, all of these opinions are possible. In the latest accusation of slander/libel, it seems reasonable for someone to view a convicted criminal with a website asking for money as having less than noble motives.

In short Steve, the people you are accusing of slander and libel are forming reasonable opinions based on the facts and that's not illegal. If for some reason a jury found the statements to be slander/libel (meaning that jury was also insane) what kind of award are they going to give for this? What damages have been caused by a handful of people talking about it on an internet forum? Oh, wait did you see that news report? The Bali government has been reading this website and because many more people from the internet think she is guilty, they have added 5 years to her sentence.

No one is defaming her and no one is causing any damages to her. Please stay on topic and argue about Corby and the Bali government or legal system, not about each other and about slander and libel.

I wish they did fingerprint the bad or whatever it was but do you know how often this is done in any country? Not very often. I'm not sure proving which country the pot was grown in would have made a huge difference but yeah I would have liked to have seen the bag dusted.