Schapelle Corby

[psychocat]

No: it isn't as simple as that. Nothing like.

We will have to agree to disagree on this one, I do believe it to be simply a question of guilt and motive.
I believe she is guilty and her motives were financial.

The real issue is should she be spending 20 YEARS in an Indonesian prison cell. No. That is absolutely grotesque, and disproportionate, whether she did it or not..

Neither you nor I have any right to tell another country what laws they may have nor what penalties to levy if someone breaks those laws.
We can disagree with them all we want.

I don't think she did it for one second. But regardless, another massive issue: the nature of the show trial. A complete and utter breach of legal and human rights. Incredible..

Who decides what those rights should be ?
What right do we have to impose our beliefs on another ?
You presume to believe that a visitor should be afforded priveliges not given to residents, why should that be ? Just because you believe it ?

Then everything that as followed, from the constant smears on her family, to the use of a sedated/drugged Schapelle Corby even this week for Indonesian photographic propaganda..

Please provide evidence that this is the case , media reports do not constitute evidence unless you can prove there is no bias.

Simplifying it hides a raft or evils, which would have raised eyebrows even in the middle ages.

You really need to read up on what was happening in the Middle ages, violence was a way to power and fueds were commonplace, war was widespread and the atrocities carried out make most modern wars look positively tame in comparison.

Even biological warfare dates from the 14th century.

CDC - Biological Warfare at the 1346 Siege of Caffa

And



I STILL THINK SHE'S GUILTY
:beatdeadhorse: