Results 1 to 10 of 21
-
08-06-2008, 03:55 AM #1OPSenior Member
Is there a difference?
I have heard numerous people say that the bud nowadays is blah blah times stronger than it was 40-50 years ago. Are there any older members out there that can shed some light on this? People I know, and even just on The Daily Show, talk about it being like grass clippings. I have been victim to a shitty bag of shake in my younger days, don't get me wrong :jointsmile:... but there is a difference between all bud being crap, and a lot of ignorant people getting ripped the hell off. :stoned:
I find it hard to believe that the quality and potency could have increased exponentially in such a short period, relative to the overall time Cannabis has been around.
I mean, how new is all this technical mumbo jumbo that we all spew out while trying to improve and perfect the growth cycle of this wonderful plant?
Is it really the new and dangerous "Skunk" form of Cannabis? hahaha
Stayand Keep :jointsmile:
TheMetal1 Reviewed by TheMetal1 on . Is there a difference? I have heard numerous people say that the bud nowadays is blah blah times stronger than it was 40-50 years ago. Are there any older members out there that can shed some light on this? People I know, and even just on The Daily Show, talk about it being like grass clippings. I have been victim to a shitty bag of shake in my younger days, don't get me wrong :jointsmile:... but there is a difference between all bud being crap, and a lot of ignorant people getting ripped the hell off. :stoned: I Rating: 5
-
08-06-2008, 04:52 AM #2Senior Member
Is there a difference?
From what I can tell all this talk of stronger weed is mostly bullshit hype meant to be used as propaganda in the "war on drugs". One of the primary sources I've heard it from is in DEA press releases and in popular media outlets... and we all know how accurate both those sources are. I even watched a foxnews story about a grow bust in Florida, and they interviewed a DEA agent who said "This isn't the marijuana we grew up with... this is 10 times strong... this stuff will kill you." :wtf: Foxnews didn't even fact check his words or clarify the story in any way (like mentioning there is not one documented death from cannabis overdose... ever).
I believe Northern Lights was first bread in the 1920's. Weed is no stronger today then it ever has been. However, stronger weed might be just be more common nowadays. I won't deny that. And it seems pretty obvious why. No longer do you have to risk revealing your identity by purchasing a book to learn about growing. You can just go online and all the info is there... you can even order seeds! So more and more people know how to get a hold of quality seeds and grow sensimilla. It isn't that we've managed to create stronger plants, its just that more people have access to the information needed to grow good weed.
Anyone who thinks higher quality marijuana is somehow more dangerous then lower quality marijuana was probably too stupid to get a hold of a decent bag of bud 20 years ago and is still too stupid to think for themselves for even a split second. God help them.
Originally Posted by TheMetal1
-
08-06-2008, 05:36 AM #3Senior Member
Is there a difference?
I've been smoking about 30 years or so, and although I agree the skunk weed these days is killer, I used to smoke some Colombian Gold back in the day that made me hallucinate. For real! No pot has ever come close to getting me that high since, so I'm not sure I agree weed is stronger these days. Just different.
-
08-06-2008, 06:37 AM #4Senior Member
Is there a difference?
I prefer the outdoor-grown stuff from back then: Black Gunji (Inida), VERY good Mexicans, Thai Sticks, Columbian Golds and Red, Belieze, great hash from Nepal and Tibet, good hash from Lebanon, Afghanistan and (sometimes) Morocco, and other areas. Today's stuff is very good, and I'm glad to have it, but there's something about imports - they all had very distinct characteristics such as color, high, taste, smell, etc - more so than most of the domestic varieties available now. Not all of them are "stronger" than their modern counterparts, as in THC level, but they often made up for that with a refreshing, happy, trippy high. Some of the new strains remind me of those days.
I've also wondered how well some of the old imported types of weed would work if vaped. :rasta:
-
08-06-2008, 03:37 PM #5Senior Member
Is there a difference?
prefer the outdoor-grown stuff from back then: Black Gunji (Inida), VERY good Mexicans, Thai Sticks, Columbian Golds and Red, Belieze, great hash from Nepal and Tibet, good hash from Lebanon, Afghanistan and (sometimes) Morocco, and other areas. Today's stuff is very good, and I'm glad to have it, but there's something about imports - they all had very distinct characteristics such as color, high, taste, smell, etc - more so than most of the domestic varieties available now. Not all of them are "stronger" than their modern counterparts, as in THC level, but they often made up for that with a refreshing, happy, trippy high. Some of the new strains remind me of those days.
__________________
Legalize it!
I totally agree with the above para I and hubby have been herbalist
alot of years, we quit for 10 years to rasie our two daughters.
Now that theyve been in their 30's both their men smoke herbs, one daughter does and one daughter doesnt the one that doesnt she said the ground moves when she smokes.
What a buzz!
thinking back.....
the wonderful 70's when life was simple and ya dint have ta piss in a cup, poop in a cup, give a blood sample, or have your hair jerked from your head
your and my privacy was respected then... wtf happend? Commuinism set in?
the 1970's
'when a nickel bag was five stinky dollars and a dime bag was ten stinky dollars and MAUI tai and hashish were running freely.
The herbs today at one hundred stinky dollars a quarter wtf! who jacked the prices up??
herbs now look like lil pine trees if its green
herbs dint wook wike dat in the 1970
-
08-06-2008, 03:40 PM #6Senior Member
Is there a difference?
The propaganda-machine caters to emotions, not reason, and the idea of a "stronger" drug raises the idea of danger in the casual listener's mind.
Even if this claim were not a total lie, anyone who sat down to think about it would realize that it is actually saying that modern marijuana is less harmful than it was in the past. This is because the only real health issue that doctors can claim as a negative for weed is the fact that smoke inhalation is detrimental to the lungs. A more potent form of marijuana requires to smoker to take in less smoke to gain the desired effect than a less potent variety would.
I'm tempted to write a letter to the DEA posing as an anti-drug citizen telling them that they are inadvertently advertising weed as safer than it was in the past.
-
08-06-2008, 04:23 PM #7OPSenior Member
Is there a difference?
Originally Posted by happiestmferoutthere
Originally Posted by Breukelen advocaat
Originally Posted by silkyblue
I won't even bother quoting TurnyBright, because it's all goood :rasta: (so was everyone else! I just got quote crazy here :stoned
I think it is great that we are becoming extremely critical thinkers and using great creativity, in a way, due to our struggle with Cannabis laws. Eventually, "they" will run out of excuses as to why things are... the way they are :thumbsup: They tell us that our modern buds are just toooo strong... we say "Yeah, so we don't have to ingest as much... limiting the potentially harmful effects of inhaling smoke. Duhhhh!" Isn't that what technology and progress tries to facilitate? Improved quality and efficiency to speed up our lives into hyperdrive... so we can stay competitive in this world? Cigarette companies aren't trying to improve the efficiency of their product so you don't have to smoke so many to achieve satisfaction. They improve potency so that you smoke MORE. Seriously, it equates to the analogy of Extra Strength Tylenol being dangerous because it is STRONGER :wtf:
Basically, our government is treating its adult population as though they are not able to take care of their own body. They believe that, without THEIR help, we would inevitably die because we simply lack the common sense to stop doing things that FUCK OUR LIVES UP! Cannabis does NOT fuck my life up. The only time it DID fuck my life up... is when ya motha fuckin fucks put those fashionable fucking bracelets on me for blowin fucking smoke rings in the woods, down by a river... walking... not driving... picking up trash and beer cans that all those "responsible drinkers" left.
I shit you fucking not
Ahhh... where did that rant come from?
-
08-06-2008, 04:28 PM #8Senior Member
Is there a difference?
you go dude
we should ALL write those letters
but all in all 'smoke ain medicine'
-
08-06-2008, 04:56 PM #9OPSenior Member
Is there a difference?
Originally Posted by silkyblue
Example:
Radiation therapy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
One of the potential side effects of radiotherapy can be cancer. :wtf:
Just because a pharmaceutical company hasn't created a medication that requires combustion to activate... doesn't mean it 'aint medicine.'
Also, Cannabis and Smoke are not synonyms...
Nothing personal... just trying to address all issues related to the argument. :hippy:
-
08-07-2008, 05:26 AM #10Senior Member
Is there a difference?
Originally Posted by TheMetal1
Donā??t waive you rights with your flag...
[SIZE=\"4\"]Got Kottonmouth?[/SIZE]
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
What is the difference?
By PatientPal in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 7Last Post: 10-27-2010, 08:06 PM -
What's the difference?
By phatsesh101 in forum Medical Marijuana Co-Op TalkReplies: 0Last Post: 04-03-2008, 04:45 PM -
Difference in looks?
By cpguitar1 in forum Basic GrowingReplies: 5Last Post: 11-28-2005, 08:34 AM -
There's a difference.
By STDzRus in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 2Last Post: 11-16-2005, 06:03 PM -
what is the difference?
By king cola in forum Indoor GrowingReplies: 2Last Post: 03-29-2004, 10:39 PM