The propaganda-machine caters to emotions, not reason, and the idea of a "stronger" drug raises the idea of danger in the casual listener's mind.

Even if this claim were not a total lie, anyone who sat down to think about it would realize that it is actually saying that modern marijuana is less harmful than it was in the past. This is because the only real health issue that doctors can claim as a negative for weed is the fact that smoke inhalation is detrimental to the lungs. A more potent form of marijuana requires to smoker to take in less smoke to gain the desired effect than a less potent variety would.

I'm tempted to write a letter to the DEA posing as an anti-drug citizen telling them that they are inadvertently advertising weed as safer than it was in the past.
TurnyBright Reviewed by TurnyBright on . Is there a difference? I have heard numerous people say that the bud nowadays is blah blah times stronger than it was 40-50 years ago. Are there any older members out there that can shed some light on this? People I know, and even just on The Daily Show, talk about it being like grass clippings. I have been victim to a shitty bag of shake in my younger days, don't get me wrong :jointsmile:... but there is a difference between all bud being crap, and a lot of ignorant people getting ripped the hell off. :stoned: I Rating: 5