Quote Originally Posted by LegalizeTheGreen
well, assuming I am allowed to actually reply to this thread, there is a difference between reporting both sides, and reporting both sides with newsworthy information. If McCain can't write any new information, why in the world would any news organization want to print it? News is about new information. Heck, the word new makes up 3/4 of the word news.
The same thing can be said about the liberals and the Fairness Doctrine. Which has been attempted to be revived by democrats for some time now to FORCE their influence across radio stations. They have been trying to push this for some time now.

This doctrine would force Radio communication companies to give equal air time to liberal talk radio shows as they do to conservative talk radio shows.

With that said.. why should these radio stations be FORCED to air something they don't find worthy. In a world news media that is very liberal why is it that conservatism is allowed to be turned down as "un news worthy" but yet the few areas where conservative news source exists they are trying to force them to air Liberal programs.

For information regarding this do a google search for "democrats fairness doctrine".

So tell me.. what do you believe in, do you believe in free speech or do you believe in equal representation in the media. Because the way the Democrats are going it seems that they are wanting to take BOTH away from us.
daihashi Reviewed by daihashi on . Times takes Obama article but rejects McCain The New York Times has reportedly rejected an editorial written by Republican presidential candidate John McCain less than a week after publishing an essay by Democratic candidate Barack Obama. The US website, Drudge Report, said the paper had refused to publish Mr McCain's piece, which was a rebuttal to Mr Obama's article title 'My Plan for Iraq'. According to the site, the paper's opinion page editor David Shipley wrote to McCain's staff: "It would be terrific to have an article from Rating: 5