That may be how it works down there but 3 of my aunts have worked in the same doctors offices as well as others here in canada, and while there are some doctors who are better than others for writing scripts, the doctor that they all worked for at one time or another does get bonuses for giving out scripts and also gets paid a healthy sum for every patient he includes in "studies" where new drugs are given to patients who are more closely followed up. When my husband went through 4 studies for his asthma all having bad reations my aunt who was working there at the time informed me that he only had to get him to do one more study to by his new camper!, and that the next study the doctor already knew was probably going to casue a reation and even if it didn't it wouldn't improve his asthma. At that point I started to grill my aunts for every bit of information I could get from inside the horror show. Here it doesn't matter as much about insurance because if you have insurance through your work(free health care not drugs) almost everything is covered unless it is for quitting smoking, even birth control is free.
I can't give you stats about all the bad reations to vaccines I've heard of through my aunts because none of you can responsibly recognize it as accurate infomation, so it is pointless. But I can teel you My Daughter got her shots for the chicken pox before I found out all of this and she had a reaction. The next shot we went in for (her MMR) I didn't want to give here right away and clearly voiced my choice to delay it or not have it entirely. My doctor not only insisted by gave it to her while we were talking it over in the waiting room. 5 days later we were in and out of the hospital 7 times in 3 days, with spots rashs and extremely high fevers, and had a very sick baby! I found out from my aunt afterwards that for MMRs he get a $50 bonus!

There are good doctors out there that follow the rules and have their patients as their first priority. But there are also good doctors out there that follow the rules or dopn't and are motivated by the kick back.

I place my beliefs on vaccines close to Jenny Macarthneys, in that I believe that we are all individuals and one general vaccine for all in ineffective and dangerous because we all react differently. Vaccinations should be set up on an individual, or at least common group standard in which babies are tested and the vaccines are tailored to be most effective for the child recieving it. I also believe that we need to stop using dangerous fillers in our vaccines and replace them with something that is healthy to put in our body. It seemed like all my efforts to feed my family organic to avoid slowly poisoning them with pesticide covered un natural food was undone the second she got her first shot.
Chronic Chrissy Reviewed by Chronic Chrissy on . People's opinion of the immunization against cervical cancer for girls there has been alot of talk in the u.k about the new vaccine being introduced to prevent cervicle cancer, it has caused some controversy as its being offered to girls from the age of 12, and as cervicle cancer is commonly caused by std's many parents feel its wrong to give it to girls so young. i was wondering what people here thought about it? my daughter is 7 this year and when she's 12 i'll probably get it done as i think every girl should have that protection, my daughter may not start Rating: 5