Quote Originally Posted by killerweed420
A lot of this was used against civilian populations. Kind of hard to tell the good guys from the bad guys in Iraq.
Please define, "alot of this", and "civillian populations", I must have missed when this happened.:jointsmile:

OK, I am calling BULLSHIT.
I know that there are unintentional civilian casualties in every war, there hasn't ever been a war that hasn't happened in.
That's not what Saddam did, and he wasn't confused when he wiped out entire towns of citizens of his own nation. Trying to equivicate what WE have done in Iraq to Saddam, Hitler, is just a little beyond ridiculous. It is also a predictable, factually false, and boring counter. I would be happy to post and match incident by incident of examples of Saddam doing just what I have described, and you could post comparable examples of us doing the same right?:wtf: Don't worry, I won't hold my breath. But seriousely that is really reaching, and vague at best.
So lets review, is there a difference between civillian casualties in the act of war that are un-intentional as compared to a small armed group from your own government rolling into town, raping women and children, then executing all person and throwing them in a giant hole? Is gassing an entire village of unarmed, unknowing, citizens of your own country just because, not even during any declared war the same as collateral damage during a declared war the same? Is this what you are saying?:wtf::wtf:

If you could find a way to make "kinda of hard to tell the civillians from the enemy" rhyme or fit on a bumper sticker then you would be in business!:thumbsup: