HvyFuel, you seem like a smart individual. That's why it confounds me that you miss the point completely. Read what you wrote. You have placed your hodgepodge template of your understanding of Christianity on me. The Catholic church nor the Pope were ever God's official institution. If you would simply pick up a Bible and read it, you would find it to be quite different from your contorted presumptions about it. You might start with the Gospel of John, or even the book of Hebrews which makes the very point that we no longer have need for a High Priest nor a Pope for that matter, as it states that Jesus is our (the believers that is) High Priest and mediator between God and man.

Spare me your tired rantings on what Christianity has done wrong. It is because men determine to reject God's plan for them and follow their own will that it responsible for all the attrocities of history. Including the men who went to church, professed faith, etc. I am not Catholic, but even I can see that just because some of their preists are pedifiles does not mean that the whole institution it bad. It would be like saying you are wrong for being American when the country makes a mistake in diplomacy or war. Whatever, its not like I am probably getting through to you.Trying the old fallacy of guilt by association. Whether God exists or not is not dependant on whether crusaders commited misdeeds in His name or not. So you should atleast consider the merits of the message.

I do not claim to know the mind of God. It's easy for you to set up strawmen just to knock them down, if you understand what I mean. I could elaborate if you need. I am only representing what He has said about Himself. I am not the author but simply a messenger.

You have said "You have already stated your belief in an ever changing God", but if you would just take a deep breath and look at what I actually wrote you will see that I wrote "never changing" and furthermore used the specific term "immutable fact of His character", do you know what immutable means? You might want to consult a dictionary. I won't bother spelling it out since I see that it's a waste of time to make a point that you will probably just blow on by again.

You can rail against me all you want for believing what is written, but mischaracterizing my points and plain ignoring them just begs the issue. You apparently don't like what God says about Himself, the world we live in, or you. It's ok, nobody will make you believe. That's the very point of Scripture, that it is your choice and freewill to reject or accept Him. But if you have through your scholarly endeavors come to the firm and supreme belief that He does not exist, then good luck explaining it to Him later. I am only attempting to share with people what I know that the Bible says and why it can be relied upon. So, I continue to answer the ludicrous objections, that any objective bystander could see are just smoke and mears. I make specific points, but through the doubters rush to declare them false the point is missed all thogether as evidenced here in this episode.

I don't mean to be harsh to others and certainly don't want to be condescending to any. We could all mutually waste each others time or instead attempt a civil exchange of ideas. Yet personal attacks and demonizing seem to be the order of the day from the naysayers. I guess that what happens when people realize they are not standing on firm ground, it gets personal.
Razer Reviewed by Razer on . Light hearted look at the old testament. This is to all the religious zealots out there. LOL Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from you, and I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind him that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the specific laws and how to best follow them. Rating: 5