Um.. maybe I didn't read enough Winnie the Pooh or something but I don't see the relation. This entire article was just a little weird and random.

I did agree with one thing in the article:

"In a subtle break from Mr Bushâ??s belief that the war on terror can be won, Mr Danzig, who is a Pentagon adviser on bioterrorism, warned that while the West can defeat individual terrorist groups and plots, it can never entirely remove the threat posed by nuclear proliferation or the prospect of bioterrorism."
I see the war on terror much the same way I see the war on drugs that was introduced by Reagan. It is not something that we can truely realistically win. Instead of dumping all of our efforts to FORCE a change.. we need to do something else to help that region MAKE a change.

I don't know what that would be; I just acknowledge it is not a war that can ever be won. I don't think that doesn't mean we shouldn't do things to attempt to prevent it but it seems a bit silly to truely believe that we can defeat terrorism.

But winnie the pooh?? Really?? come on now, lol :stoned:
daihashi Reviewed by daihashi on . Obama aide: Why Winnie the Pooh should shape US foreign policy Winnie the Pooh, Luke Skywalker and British football hooligans could shape the foreign policy of Barack Obama if he becomes US President, according to a key adviser. Richard Danzig, who served as Navy Secretary under President Clinton and is tipped to become National Security Adviser in an Obama White House, told a major foreign policy conference in Washington that the future of US strategy in the war on terrorism should follow a lesson from the pages of Winnie the Pooh, which can be Rating: 5