Um.. maybe I didn't read enough Winnie the Pooh or something but I don't see the relation. This entire article was just a little weird and random.

I did agree with one thing in the article:

"In a subtle break from Mr Bush??s belief that the war on terror can be won, Mr Danzig, who is a Pentagon adviser on bioterrorism, warned that while the West can defeat individual terrorist groups and plots, it can never entirely remove the threat posed by nuclear proliferation or the prospect of bioterrorism."
I see the war on terror much the same way I see the war on drugs that was introduced by Reagan. It is not something that we can truely realistically win. Instead of dumping all of our efforts to FORCE a change.. we need to do something else to help that region MAKE a change.

I don't know what that would be; I just acknowledge it is not a war that can ever be won. I don't think that doesn't mean we shouldn't do things to attempt to prevent it but it seems a bit silly to truely believe that we can defeat terrorism.

But winnie the pooh?? Really?? come on now, lol :stoned: