I think John McCain represents a change for the better, but mostly because the Bush admnistration has been SO BAD.

I think McCain would be more bipartisan than Bush in his approach to the opposition party.

I think he would be far more fiscally responsible than Bush, who has nearly bankrupted this country.

I think he would be more competent in conducting the war, even though he doesn't really represent any change in policy on the war. Instead of this half-committed, let-it-bleed Bush appraoch, I think McCain would either go all out, or he would get out.

I prefer McCain's more moderate kind of Republican style over Bush's ultra-conservative style. I think he wouldn't be as beholden to the religious right as Bush was.

I think he would end the torture of suspected terrorists.

At this point I am going to vote for Obama, but I think McCain would represent a positive change away from some of the things I have hated most about the Bush adminstration. He would not be a complete disaster like Bush was.
dragonrider Reviewed by dragonrider on . Do You Think John McCain Represents ??Change?? In an election where a vast majority of people think the country is on the wrong track, it??s to be expected that politicians will try to present themselves as representing ??change.? Barack Obama has presented himself as representing ??change you can believe in.? John McCain is in a more difficult position because he is in the incumbent party, but he has countered that he represents the right kind of change. Some think that John McCain will be a much more bipartisan president than Rating: 5