Quote Originally Posted by killerweed420
The only candidate that would have the balls to do anything about this would be Ron Paul.

Whom would he appoint as AG? Is that person specifically on the record saying that they would support removing cannabis from the sched of narcotics, and lump it in with the ATF for regulation?

Show me where on HIS SITE that it says he would work to appoint an AG or demand Congress remove cannabis from the sched of narcotics. I can save you some time. It doesn't. And don't give me the "he respects state's bs cop out line".
Oh great, so let me get this straight, for at best, 8 years while Wrong Paul is president, you will be fine. Then after that, what? What do you think would happen? I know. You do to. So does he. But that's not the point, the point is, he does not value cannabis any more or less than anyone else that is running, promise. And he is about as useful as a fart in a tornado. It really does make me angry that he gives the impression of being sincerely compassionate, but in reality my friend, he is not. He is very, very, careful with the words he chooses, just like Obama, and others. The problem I see now, is that there are sooo many people that believe Ron Paul wants to legalize pot, that if you suggest that may not be the case, potheads everywhere froth at the mouth, like you fucked there mother or something! For fucks sake people c'mon now. Someones siggie says that people that use cannabis are LESS SUCEPTIBLE to propoganda, not any less than anyone else, I don't believe cannabis is a factor in that equation. Just look at all the people that have bought in to Paul and Obama, people that use cannabis that is. They are all just as glassy eyed as the "true believers" that don't use.

There is sooo much on this topic already here, I don't want to do a whole new thread, but really just look. All sides (this argument has 3) are well represented and there is alot of info. It's a good topic though, really scrutinizing what exactly politicians "do" and "say".