Well... i think i must explain a thing i didnt... the name "theory of everything" is a proof of the arrogance of many scientists, cause this theory, as they search for it, is only and just only a theory that describes the physical laws. But the physical laws are not the only ones needed for the universe to work, and the other laws (chemical, biological, etc), cant be deduced from only the physical laws... so the right would be call this theory "unified theory of physics"... and NOT theory of everything... cause surely physics is NOT everything.

Themetal1, very nice that quote from Holographic Universe... i didnt read it, but will try find some copy to read... so its thought that the universe has a kind of fractal order through it? its very interesting indeed... and also its one of the things discussed in one book i did read about science and occult.
There was said that occult is NOT what people thinks, like witchcraft, channeling spirits, rituals, etc, but an extension of the science... like if science were a subset of the occult... and its interesting that many recent physical theories are very similar to occult knowledges from long ago... so maybe science is just re-discovering things that were known already...
If you like to read mind-expanding things, and have the open mind for (very) unusual views, you surely will enjoy this book... and reading it stoned is even better! :jointsmile::rastasmoke::thumbsup:
Coelho Reviewed by Coelho on . Why i think a Theory of Everything wont be ever made Well... today the scientists, mainly the physicists, search for a "theory of everything", a theory which explain all the physical phenomena in the universe. But i (as a physicist) believe they wont suceed. Imagine that you are an observer, and are examining, lets say, an atom. I know that atoms are not rigid spheres, but its not the point. If you were doing so, when you looked at the atom, you would see something like the picture below. If you didnt know that what you was seeing on the Rating: 5