I think you're right about not finding M-theory untill the people doing the research fully understand that they have to factor their observation into the equation.
Since the collective conciousness of all people combine to create our physical reality how can you find a theoretical framework that doesn't recognise the ovservers roll in what is observed?
It would be nice if our society (and i mean global society) could regain some of the spirituality of the old shamanistic cultures.
:thumbsup::jointsmile:
Esoteric416 Reviewed by Esoteric416 on . Why i think a Theory of Everything wont be ever made Well... today the scientists, mainly the physicists, search for a "theory of everything", a theory which explain all the physical phenomena in the universe. But i (as a physicist) believe they wont suceed. Imagine that you are an observer, and are examining, lets say, an atom. I know that atoms are not rigid spheres, but its not the point. If you were doing so, when you looked at the atom, you would see something like the picture below. If you didnt know that what you was seeing on the Rating: 5