Quote Originally Posted by Coelho
Well... i think i must explain a thing i didnt... the name "theory of everything" is a proof of the arrogance of many scientists, cause this theory, as they search for it, is only and just only a theory that describes the physical laws. But the physical laws are not the only ones needed for the universe to work, and the other laws (chemical, biological, etc), cant be deduced from only the physical laws... so the right would be call this theory "unified theory of physics"... and NOT theory of everything... cause surely physics is NOT everything.
Wow I had no idea there was actually a "theory of everything"... I had sorta developed what I called my "everything is everything" theory one day. ah, fun daydreaming stuff.

Actually, chemistry and biology are just specialized areas of physics. After all, it's just atoms and molecules doing stuff; physical things. It's like an in-depth form of physics to explain some things in greater detail that the basic laws do not cover. For example, physics studies matter, chemicals are also matter, so we invented chemistry with it's own set of laws to describe the detailed physics of chemicals and chemical reactions. I believe physics is almost everything... it might really be everything if we only had a way to measure it all.... but we will never know.

When it comes to things that don't seem to be made of matter, like gravity, that really blows my mind. We can measure physical effects of it and have a good theory of how it works, we still don't know WHY it works. lol...
I keep hoping that they'll discover gravitons some day.... but then it supposedly has no mass... argh... It's easier to not think about it, even if we had all the answers, we're extremely limited with how we can use the knowledge.