I was born (C of E) Church of England and protestant.
I went to Sunday school which was held in the local church.
I attended classes in religious education.

I don't believe in good or evil as the temptation of SATAN or the redemption of CHRIST but as choices we make , the consequences of which we can or cannot accept.
The good choices being seen as the result of good guidance from "God" and the bad choices being the result of evil in the form of temptation or greed. Many humans prefer not to have to take responsibility for thier own choices and actions.
How attractive must it be to have a get out clause (religion) to push the responsibility onto ?
I see humans as much more animalistic and believe that each of us is capable of deciding how we can justify what others may see as being "bad"
The degree of self interest and the lengths that some will go to in order to benefit themselves is measured against popular moral norms.
If anothers actions exceed what the majority percieve to be the morals of society then they are labled evil .

Just an atheists and common or garden sociopaths view of things.
psychocat Reviewed by psychocat on . Why it is wrong to NOT attack religion We do not allow discrimination here based on race, gender, sexual orientation, nationality, age, economic status, or if you do or do not eat okra. It should go without saying that making fun of other religions is not allowed. That is from the respect part two thread, and I would like to point out some flaws in it. I will try to be as respectful as I can though. The list of discriminatory topics has absolutely nothing to do with religion. I can't choose to be born a certain race, sex, etc. Rating: 5