Democratic talk of an early, hard-hitting campaign to "define" and tar Arizona Sen. John McCain appears to have fizzled for lack of money, leading to a quiet round of finger-pointing among Democratic operatives and donors as McCain assembles a campaign and a public image relatively unmolested.

Despite the millions of dollars pooling around Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton, anti-McCain funds have fallen far short of the hopes set in November, when a key organizer, Tom Matzzie, reportedly told The Washington Post that the "Fund for America" would raise more than $100 million to support the activities of a range of allied groups.

The Democratic National Committee, too, is organizing an anti-McCain campaign, but a spokeswoman, Karen Finney, said fundraising to support that effort has met "mixed" results.

So while news releases and Internet ads have been launched, the largest-bore weapon in contemporary politics â?? a sustained television campaign â?? hasn't. That's because, people involved say, the soft-money groups don't have the soft money.

"Many of the people who would normally be involved in such an effort are overly focused on the primary, which is a mistake," said Michael Vachon, a spokesman for George Soros, who is the largest individual donor to the Fund for America, which in turn has passed on at least $1.4 million to what was expected to be the main attack group, an organization called the Campaign to Defend America.

"We know we're going to have a good Democratic nominee â?? it's time for Democrats to turn their attention to John McCain," Vachon said.

Leading Democratic donors decided last fall not to repeat the 2004 pattern of pouring money into ad hoc organizations that would dissolve after the election. Instead, they created the Fund for America, led by former White House Chief of Staff John Podesta. Mattzie, a former MoveOn official, help spur its creation and now heads the Campaign to Defend America.

As recently as January, Democratic circles were abuzz with talk that a Democratic hammer would fall on McCain as soon as he secured the nomination, fulfilling the conventional wisdom of politics that it's crucial to define your opponent early, before he has a chance to make his case.

The Campaign to Defend America even solicited drafts of advertisements from several Democratic consultancies, which it showed to potential donors and tested on focus groups, said a person familiar with the activities. But McCain's victory speeches came and went without the group making an impact on his campaign.
Anti-McCain groups lag in fundraising - Ben Smith - Politico.com

LMAO! Leading Dems set up a special organization to bash McCain but they don't have the cash because they're to busy spending money bashing each other. PRICELESS!

Have a good one!:s4:
Psycho4Bud Reviewed by Psycho4Bud on . Anti-McCain groups lag in fundraising Democratic talk of an early, hard-hitting campaign to "define" and tar Arizona Sen. John McCain appears to have fizzled for lack of money, leading to a quiet round of finger-pointing among Democratic operatives and donors as McCain assembles a campaign and a public image relatively unmolested. Despite the millions of dollars pooling around Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton, anti-McCain funds have fallen far short of the hopes set in November, when a key organizer, Tom Rating: 5