Quote Originally Posted by Rusty Trichome
Suffice it to say that I was reacting to the tone and content of your arguments.

If someone cares to bash Bush, and it's a valid bash, they will likely never hear a peep out of me. If someone wants to rant away, using propoganda, false information, questionable timelines, obtuse rationale or outright lies...I'm quite capable of taking the time to verify the info, and respond accordingly. I do it daily.

And when was the last time bashing a president did any good? Were I to bash Clinton on a daily basis, would my views sway you without facts? Would you blindly accept my views without finding out the facts for yourself? This is what the liberal broadcast media has come to expect from us. Blind acceptance of propoganda.
My responses are generally aimed to present an opposing set of facts, that rival the premise of the post. I don't for a second think I can change anyone's mind, but perhaps if I could just open a mind or two, it's well worth the effort.

When the time arises and Bush is no longer in the White House, I'll likely defend the sitting president. (let's hope it's not a democrat, lol) Depending on who's elected to the office, my zeal may not be as evident...but doubtful I'd just start bashing for the sake of bashing.

But I wasn't the one trying to blame the USA (Bush) for 're-starting' their (continued since the 80's) nuke program. He restarted the program because he wants nukes.
How you feel about your patriotism, is up to you. I don't really give a damn, either way. For me it's not about who is more the American, or who is more patriotic..it's who has their facts straight, and who is peddling bullshit?
Great. Let's you and I leave it at that and let this thread get back to "Richardson Endorses Obama" if it can.