Quote Originally Posted by Aqueminiaz
ok well lets act like there is some validility to the "study"
Sorry when it comes to science, I am a scientist by nature and I go by facts not acting. What's the use in faking it when you want to know the truth or the correct answer?

Quote Originally Posted by Aqueminiaz
if pectin did work as an effective adulterant, I would be getting the same results from drinking it down as it will still be present in the sample that I provide, right?
No you wouldn't. Do things go through your body unchanged? When was the last time you drank a Coke and your urine turned black?

Quote Originally Posted by Aqueminiaz
i had read that thread before i started this thread, i can agree that there is no solid evidence pointing to any thing in my method as being effective in helping to beat a drug test, but
I can also say that I've been passing and I haven't really cut back smoking. Who's to say that just because something hasn't been conclusively proven, that it doesn't work?
As I said before, I am a scientist by nature and I either want things backed up with a solid study conducted on a large sample size with a statistically significant result without bias from the sponsor conducted by people who are competent with the scientific method. The scientific method is basically conducting an experiment in a certain way usually where only one varibale is changed, developing a hypothesis, and testing the hypothesis. The hypothesis that pectin forms a barrier around metabolites sounds like something you would see in science fiction.

You say this:
Quote Originally Posted by Aqueminiaz
Who's to say that just because something hasn't been conclusively proven, that it doesn't work?
I say that just because 2 events occur doesn't mean that they are related it may be sheer coincidence. That's why you come up with a hypothesis based on research and fact and then test it. According to your reasoning then that's like saying "Well I ate a pizza today and I passed my test and it was because of the pizza. It is the job of whoever is making the claim to prove it. Besides, anyone with a lick of sense can tell you that pectin doesn't surround metabolites.

See I am pretty sure I make no claims in the thread I linked. I gave facts about soluble fiber and its role in THC elimination and then stated that pectin is soluble fruit fiber and basically formed a hypothesis but I haven't tested it yet, which I never claim to do. Everyone who reads that thread seems to appreciate the science contained in it and not the speculation that some posts have in them.
FakeBoobsRule Reviewed by FakeBoobsRule on . Can I beat randoms using this method?? I'm 6'3 265 Smoked say ~2 blunts a day for past 3 months Facing weekly random drug testing, monitered of course. I cut back my smoking habit to something more reasonable say ~2-3x a week. my current regiment includes: 1000mg niacin a night ~2am (for yellow color in my urine) on test days I find out around 6:50 am, and begin diluting with water and gatorade (first bottle of gatorade includes packet of pectin). When I test at ~9:15 The niacin keeps my urine vitamin yellow, I know that Rating: 5