ok well lets act like there is some validility to the "study", if pectin did work as an effective adulterant, I would be getting the same results from drinking it down as it will still be present in the sample that I provide, right?

i had read that thread before i started this thread, i can agree that there is no solid evidence pointing to any thing in my method as being effective in helping to beat a drug test, but
I can also say that I've been passing and I haven't really cut back smoking. Who's to say that just because something hasn't been conclusively proven, that it doesn't work?