Can I beat randoms using this method??

[FakeBoobsRule]

ok well lets act like there is some validility to the "study"

Sorry when it comes to science, I am a scientist by nature and I go by facts not acting. What's the use in faking it when you want to know the truth or the correct answer?

if pectin did work as an effective adulterant, I would be getting the same results from drinking it down as it will still be present in the sample that I provide, right?

No you wouldn't. Do things go through your body unchanged? When was the last time you drank a Coke and your urine turned black?

i had read that thread before i started this thread, i can agree that there is no solid evidence pointing to any thing in my method as being effective in helping to beat a drug test, but
I can also say that I've been passing and I haven't really cut back smoking. Who's to say that just because something hasn't been conclusively proven, that it doesn't work?

As I said before, I am a scientist by nature and I either want things backed up with a solid study conducted on a large sample size with a statistically significant result without bias from the sponsor conducted by people who are competent with the scientific method. The scientific method is basically conducting an experiment in a certain way usually where only one varibale is changed, developing a hypothesis, and testing the hypothesis. The hypothesis that pectin forms a barrier around metabolites sounds like something you would see in science fiction.

You say this:

Who's to say that just because something hasn't been conclusively proven, that it doesn't work?

I say that just because 2 events occur doesn't mean that they are related it may be sheer coincidence. That's why you come up with a hypothesis based on research and fact and then test it. According to your reasoning then that's like saying "Well I ate a pizza today and I passed my test and it was because of the pizza. It is the job of whoever is making the claim to prove it. Besides, anyone with a lick of sense can tell you that pectin doesn't surround metabolites.

See I am pretty sure I make no claims in the thread I linked. I gave facts about soluble fiber and its role in THC elimination and then stated that pectin is soluble fruit fiber and basically formed a hypothesis but I haven't tested it yet, which I never claim to do. Everyone who reads that thread seems to appreciate the science contained in it and not the speculation that some posts have in them.