Quote Originally Posted by McLeodGanja
But what I mean is that when you attempt to homogenise society across great demographic oceans, you will find that the variation in the will of the people becomes ever greater. Not everyone is standing in the aisle, I suppose in some ways perhaps many are. But on issues such as the legalisation of cannabis and war, for example, people are pretty divided. My solution is to decentralise power on most issues, retaining centralised control over security and the environment, perhaps for starters. Let the people decide over the smaller issues, allow for a more tribal structure on the smaller scale. For example, if some don't want people in their neighborhood smoking pot, then they can fuck off and live in a different town, and vice versa, problem solved! Then everyone is happy. Yeah I know of course I fail too see the bigger picture, it's not going work, not now anyway, people are too stupid. Like I said though is require everyone to have an open mind, and few people have in todays world.

The thing about centralised governments is that they fail miserably to address any kind of problems that come up, because the system does not allow them to. They are responsible for causing many of the problems in the first place and they attempt to patch things up by introducing more ineffectual laws, which in turn only exacerbate the problem further.
The problem is lobbyists wining and dining government clients to secure votes. Lobbyists have hijacked the system and influence the system in the wrong way. If you have money, you can do anything. Once the overall cannabis smokers are more wealthy and in bigger numbers, things will get done. Book it.
thcbongman Reviewed by thcbongman on . Could you "reach across the aisle?" Everyone seems to wish for a candidate who could "reach across the aisle" --- someone who could compromise with the opposing party in order to get things done. Politicians used to be better at this but seem to have forgotten how it's done. Bush ran as a "uniter, not a divider," but his idea of "reaching across the aisle" seems to be, "Here's what I'm gonna do. I invite you to vote for it, even if you are opposed to it. And, no, I'm not gonna compromise." That's not really "reaching across the Rating: 5