Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Clandestine
:S2:

Libertarians are alright in my book, and I'm kinda tired of the "one party supremacy" idea anyway. I always stand by my convictions, but feel that power would be misused far less if these hot topics were left in the hands of individual states. I cringe after thinking of what might be possible if either of the Dem candidates reigns in our nations highest office. Maybe one day it'll be the Libertarians who level the political playing field in these respects.
Yeah, George Washington warned of a two party system. And this is why. The founding fathers wanted the individual states to rule on issues such as abortion, gay marriage, drugs, prostituation, and other "hot topic" issues. The main federal government was only there so if you needed to band together during a time of war or other national crisis you would have a main centralized system (and to print money).

And we can only hope the two party system fades. But currently everyone is so concerned with parties and gaining and losing power I don't see it happening soon.
rebgirl420 Reviewed by rebgirl420 on . Bush: Bad president? Or WORST president EVER? I may have possibly revealed my own bias in the title of this thread, but YOU get to decide, and to be fair, there are options other than Bad and Worst. You can even select Best if you are crazy (don't let me influence your vote -- select Best if you really want to, you crazy nutjob). Whatever you vote for, please post a reason. If you think he is bad, why? If you think he is good, what are his accomplishments and who do you think has done a worse job? For example: I think George W. Bush Rating: 5