Quote Originally Posted by tha del sound
Anyway, what I'm getting at is that as a moderator I think you should be the one who converses with someone like me and tells me why I shouldn't do what I wanted to. ......

......but don't you think someone who cared so strongly about it would try and turn people on to it instead of shut them out of it?.
I think 13,000 posts, over 10,000 of them in the grow section, several instructional stickies and tutorials, and a real-world commitment to helping legal medical users learn to grow their own medicine should be proof enough that I give a shit.

Converses? I made a sticky already telling members in NO UNCERTAIN TERMS that I would not tolerate posts that talked about breaking other laws while growing cannabis. PERIOD.

This whole argument is a bit insulting to what I work for, which is widespread access to meds and a better public opinion of those who must use them.... But you're 'faded' so I guess it's okay... ?

By the way, using being stoned as an excuse for being argumentative isn't helping the general perception of stoners' intellects either...
stinkyattic Reviewed by stinkyattic on . What in tarnation? Well, I had one of my threads closed earlier and I have a discrepancy with it. It was a thread regarding a possible guerilla growing site that was on a neighbor's roof. From what I gather, stinkyattic closed it because I was insinuating taking advantage of this older couples roof, but that doesn't make any sense to me. Why am I not allowed to talk about guerilla growing since it involves a roof as opposed to a forest or something like that? Either way, I would be illegally using property. What Rating: 5