You don't have to re-open the thread. This post was just me trying to voice my opinion that threads, like mine, have been unrightly closed. Not unrightly in the way that I was at no fault, but unrightly because you, as a moderator, just told me I was wrong and closed the thread instead of pursuing further discussion of it. In the end, we would probably come to the same conclusion that I shouldn't do it, but when you just close a thread, I, as someone looking for information, feel like I've been shit on by those whose opinions I so highly regard. My initial reaction was, "Well, fuck you!" Had I been a less reasonable person I might have grown it out of spite of you. A part of me wanted to, ahaha, but I do listen when people tell me I have a bad idea. Anyway, what I'm getting at is that as a moderator I think you should be the one who converses with someone like me and tells me why I shouldn't do what I wanted to. Like I said earlier, the same conclusion of "bad idea" would emerge either way probably, but I really, strongly disagree with the way you went about it. As you said, you are very adamant about the topic and I do understand why, but don't you think someone who cared so strongly about it would try and turn people on to it instead of shut them out of it? Do you get what I'm saying? I'm kinda rambling since I'm faded. Oh, and sorry for the title.
tha del sound Reviewed by tha del sound on . What in tarnation? Well, I had one of my threads closed earlier and I have a discrepancy with it. It was a thread regarding a possible guerilla growing site that was on a neighbor's roof. From what I gather, stinkyattic closed it because I was insinuating taking advantage of this older couples roof, but that doesn't make any sense to me. Why am I not allowed to talk about guerilla growing since it involves a roof as opposed to a forest or something like that? Either way, I would be illegally using property. What Rating: 5