Quote Originally Posted by Coelho
Yes... but in 2009 we just need add 1759 instead 1758 and 1758 instead 1757, in 2010 we need add 1760 instead 1758 and 1759 instead 1757 and so...

And the process is very simple. Just some math...
i guess, but the real question is how does it always end up being right, while you do change the age by increasing those numbers, what about the other number, how could that always be right?