So "IF" the science is there?
That is a qualifying condition, very good politician speak.
He can't answer this question the same way twice unfortunately. Can you say, "false hope".

I also have a real problem with the fact that it is only being discussed for medical use? WTF?
Can someone explain why only "special" people are "entitled" to use marijuana?
It should be legal for anyone, for any reason period.
You don't want people "bullshitting" their way to get a rec, then legalize it period.
I don't blame anyone for getting a bull shit paper tiger rec, it is a small amount of insurance against "local" authorities anyway, and the consequences legally could be as harmful as physical illness.
Hard to provide for a family when you are in dibillitating pain, also hard when you are in jail.

So please someone explain why only "sick" people deserve to get to use marijuana? I am all ears.
P.S.
Continuing to advocate solely for medical use, will not help in advocating for people that legit need it, or in advocating for personal use. It simply allows the debate to be contained in an arena that is easily defeatable, while continuing prohibtition.
YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO SPECIAL RIGHTS BECAUSE OF A SICKNESS OR DISEASE!
EVERYONE SHOULD HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS WITH CANNABIS.