Quote Originally Posted by F L E S H

Didn't think so.
Wow dude, your really kind of excitable ain't cha? Let's have a look at your your exciting post.

"Again, typical American-style two-choice decision."

That is a straight out lie. I asked you a question. I never said that you had to be either one or the other, you added that in. Your programed responses won't work with me. I have seen most of them before. Again, your typical holer then thou canadian style BS is a hypocritical pile of crap.

"THere's nothing in the middle, right? "

Wrong, there is plenty in the middle. Had you not assumed to know the meaning of my question, and just answered it, you might have seen that there is something in the middle. Of course there is only what you believe and what I believe, theres nothing in the middle, right?

"I'm either a fascist, or a communist, but nothing exists in the middle."

Hmmm, yep, you got that right?! I like sarcasim. You should make sure you are using it in the right way though. If I ask you a question, it doesn't mean I am impyling an answer every time. It means I am asking for an answer sometimes, to see what you think of what ever I am questioning you about. Not everyone is alway as sarcastic as you.

"nobody here's telling anyone what to do, in fact the government is made up of a bunch of cowards who cave in to every demand made by taxpayers."

Your blind to what your own government does. How many people does your government kill every year to earn a profit? How much oppression and death is placed on others so that you can retire in comfort? How many nuclear bombs has your exported plutonium produced? Is your government still jailing people for drugs? I believe your government is lying to you taxpayers in canada.

"I'm not saying our government is better than yours, I'm just trying to prove that there's more than yes or no, black or white, up or down."

So you got something to prove do ya? You may not have needed to prove anything if you had not tried to read something into my question that wasn't there in the first place.

"Taking a document written in the 1770s literally is absolutely stupid."

So your saying the amendments that protect Freedom of speech, religion, and so on are stupid? Interesting thought's you have man. I wonder, do you also think it is stupid to not want to be randomly searched by the government? Stupid??? Stupid is thinking a government without the constraints of a document spelling out it's powers in a firm and unchanging way is somehow a good thing. Like I said before, ignoring that document is why we have a drug war. Say, hows that drug war prisoner release of yours going? Ha!

"In case you haven't noticed, we're in the year 2005."

We are??? Fuck!!! I 'm getting old!

"That's a 230 year difference."

Damn, that's gotta mean we have one of the oldest governments around. Cool!

"Are you going to tell me that your priorities are the same as people who lived 230 years ago?"

When it comes to liberty, and rights, yes, I will tell you they are the same.

"Do you need to fight off the British army because you don't wanna pay taxes to the king anymore?"

No, but I do want my government to respect my rights that are spelled out in the constitution. Theres something about letting the government decide what is and what isn't a right that just doesn't sit well with me. I would rather my rights be set in stone.

"Didn't think so."

Hmmm, I guess that means it's either your way or no way. Must not be any middle of the road when it's you speaking. I guess you didn't think, so now you will need to think again.

Toker