Quote Originally Posted by thecurious1
:wtf: Just because there is a division in your "social circle" doesn't mean there is a split nationally. Again, on EVERY poll I've seen ... the majority believe BOTH Hilary and Obama will make great Dem candidates. Hillary and Obama have both stated that opinion many times as well, including once again last night.

Again, you also have the fact that Obama is beating Hillary in recent states by more than McCain is beating Huckabee.
This would leave one to believe that so far the Dems have been more certain who their candidate should be than the Reps.
There was more of a turnout with the GOP when there were more candidates. Since the field has narrowed down it seems that the "lock" is being taken for granted.

Then there are those like me that voted for Clinton in the primary with the feeling that she is the weaker candidate and also to keep them at war against each other.

Quote Originally Posted by thecurious1
I agree with McCain on the issue of "Pork" spending ... unfortunately that isn't a major political issue to me.
Everybody is speaking of "change" though. Part of change is getting ahold of the budget. How can a person proclaim himself/herself as being the leader of change when they ARE, and have been, part of the current problem?

Quote Originally Posted by thecurious1
We went to war with the last 2 Republican presidents we have had in this country .... In the past 15 years I've seen plenty of Rep politicians claim they are "Reagan-men" only to see them display the lack of patience that RR certainly did not have.
Shit is starting to fly in Kosovo again.......when did Clinton get us into that one. War is a bipartisan issue. Hell, Obama is all about bombing Pakistan whether they like it or not. Not to mention his current proclamation about ending the genocide in Darfur. How do ya end that without troops on the ground?

Have a good one!:s4: