Is our herb really multiple times more potent than 70s ganj?

[denial102]

Weed is stronger, but not as much as they'd have you think - they spew out the normal "10 times stronger, 20 times stronger" shit - it's only just about double - if that!

Indoor growing, removing males, selecting the best phenotypes, cross breeding etc etc is why it's stronger these days - but it could have been done back then too.

And anyway - the hash back then was better than the stuff we get now [in the UK, back then there was no such thing as soapbar - now it's everywhere]

So, herb HAS got slightly better, and hash has got alot worse [in regards to the UK cannabis market.]

agreed double, triple quadruple maybe if you are some crazy mad scientist, 10x and 20x is misleading, bigtime.

Peace,
Denial

denial102 Reviewed by denial102 on 02-19-2008. Is our herb really multiple times more potent than 70s ganj? I remember the most recent drug czar realizing that most people had tried herb, so he attempted to coaz parents into getting more zealous by saying that the stuff they harmlessly "experimented" with was very different from the "super strains" of modern day. Any how if I went back in time and nicked a hippies sack would it really be exceptionally weaker than our standard chronic? Rating: 5