Quote Originally Posted by fishman3811
skush if you knew anything about steel you would know steel melts at temps higher than what airplane fuel burns at....So if the fuel from the plane didnt melt the steel beams then what did?Please dont call me a conspiracy nut because science is science.But then again science has no reasoning in your thoughts.
This shit has been debunked along ago. I'll admit I actually once believed this shit. It's simply taking a fact of science and misapplying the concept.

Simple explanation. How WTC was structurally designed as the strongest beams surrounding the sides, leaving the center without strong support, it's the weakest point of the building. Regardless of whether the steel beams melted or not, there are a load of petroleum and a fire. Things burn, there is bound to be a degree of structural collapse, which changes the weight distribution. Like a funnel, all the weight of the debris becomes concentrated in the center. Eventually all those beams can't support all the weight in the center, causing the floors to buckle. It's not an instantaneous process like it seemed on TV. It took some time, but once you have all that weight distributed to the center, it becomes a domino effect. Each floor had to buckle, and once there is enough energy, each floor collapsed faster under the pressure of the weight because it's unable to absorb the energy the excessive weight caused. The law of gravity is applied here, and it's science bro