Quote Originally Posted by The Dude Of Life
Probably because he is a racist and nazi sympathizer who only caters to the rich and pot smokers and eliminates the welfare system and public housing all the way.
Racist? Nazi sympathizer? I don't see where you support this information. Please show me what has caused you to believe that Ron Paul is a racist. Has he perhaps made a statement saying that he hates people of color? If so, enlighten me.

As far as a Nazi sympathizer, Dr. Paul is nothing of the sort. I assume you are referring to the situation in which he received a small campaign donation from a white supremacist. I'll let him explain his stance himself:

YouTube - Ron Paul remarks on allegations of being racist

Also, Ron Paul has openly stated that our drug laws target the black race and if elected he would pardon every non-violent drug offender in prison. Does that sound like the stance of a white supremacist to you?

To be quite honest, I can understand why a white supremacist would want Ron Paul to become president. Ron Paul upholds the constitution, look at his congressional voting record. This means he supports free speech. He is the ONLY candidate that I know of that has spoken of the importance of the constitution and free speech. Right now, the only tool that white supremacists and racists in general have is their right to free speech. So you tell me- If you were a white supremacist, and your ultimate goal was to spread your word about the masterdom of the white race, which candidate would you support?

I really feel that the media has put an unfair spin on the story. The donation from the white supremacist means one thing- that he supports Ron Paul. That does NOT mean that Ron Paul supports him. So would you rather have that $500 in the pocket of a white supremacist, who openly supports the oppression of all races but one, or in the pocket of a man who fully supports the constitution, a document that states "All men are created equal..." ? I'm sure if you looked through every single donation given to each candidate, there would be at LEAST one undesirable donation. Is this really what the campaign coverage has come to? Nitpicking through donations to find dirt on a candidate? Then I must say, Ron Paul should be proud that the media had to knock down his supporters to find dirt on him. That must be because he has a pristine voting record.

I find it really discouraging to see that people cannot even have an informed discussion without turning to name calling. It's just fucking immature. KUSH especially. You claim to "tear apart" peoples posts, but you haven't really presented facts.

"Hey, thanks I didn't realize that the Federal Government subsidized commercials on tv for drug companies. I don't watch much tv though. And when I do it has little to nill influence on me at all, even those hypnotizing government sponsored pharmaceutical ads. I think what you just said says a lot about you.!"

Ever hear of the FCC? I think I heard somewhere that they REGULATE TELEVISION AND PRINTED MEDIA. And as far as I've seen, they haven't done much regulation of the pharmaceutical industry. Or Alcohol and big Tobacco either. Interesting...