Quote Originally Posted by dragonrider
The thing is, I think the article you quoted is doing exactly what you describe as an inferior method of debate. It never makes a strong connection between Obama and all the negative points it makes about Louis Farakhan. All it says is Obama respects Wright, Wright respects Farakhan, Farakhan did bad things, therefore Obama is in favor of the bad things Farakhan did. It's pathetically weak. I think it's doing exactly what you were describing --- it throws a bunch of neagative crap on the wall about Lious Farakhan and Kwanzaa and hopes some of it will spatter onto Obama.
Yup. Isn't it frustrating...? I've spent the last two days waiting for someone to read the article and comment on the damn thing, and it's source. No one mentioned anything to do about the article, and yet continue to rant. Yes the intent of the article was clearly to be a hatchet-job. Same as the liberal anti-america bullshit y'all spout daily without checking into the facts.

In adopting the "question authority" mindset, I just have to ask...
Those that teach you we need to question authority, who is it among you that are questioning their authority? Like intellectual sheep to a slaughter, you never seem to question the source or the information as long as it fits neatly in your "I Hate Bush" philosophy.
Guess as long as there is no responsibility twords honesty, it's easy to justify.

Obama's association with and being a major contributor to, TUCoC for 20 years qualifies him to be judged by the doctrine from that church. This type of doctrine hasn't just happened overnight, but has been there since the day he stepped foot inside that church.
Am I afraid of that doctrine? No, but am somewhat disgusted by it.