"Therefore, any federal regulations of intoxicants which are effectively the same to said substances as the eighteenth amendment is to alcohol are null and void, and are SPECIFICALLY granted to the states by analogy. Blow a hole in this argument if you can."


So are you saying Marijuana is "effectively the same" as alcohol, cocaine and heroin? Ya done one, youve done em all right?


Nothing is EVER granted to the states by analogy, where the hell do you get that from.

It seems you didnt read the 18th amendment very well. It specifically states liqours.

Section 1. After one year from the ratification of this article the manufacture, sale, or transportation of liquors within, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the United States and all territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited.

Section 1 states specifically of Liqours, I.E. Ethanol, the drinking alcohol. No other drugs.
What the hell is your argument again?

If it is that the 18th amendment implicitly included all drugs because alcohol is no different from drugs the way that newspapers are not different from television, then I want you to try it in the court of law and see how far you will get, because that is a ridiculous argument and will be treated as such.

You claim that a drink containing cannabis would exactly fit the definition of an intoxicating liqour. Incorrect. It exactly fits the definition of an ILLEGAL intoxicating liqour beverage

A non alcohol drink containing marijuana(like Marijuana Tea) is NOT an intoxicating liqour. It is an illegal intoxicating beverage.

Your wording is very confusing and jumbled together. What are you asking?

Your claim and your warrant do not correlate very well.