Right now I am abstaining because I'm looking for work. However, if one were to make a beverage with a thc-containing cannabis extract, that drink would exactly fit the definition of an intoxicating liquor used as a beverage, which is the wording of the 18th amendment. See definition b here: http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/liquor

Also for the federal government to have a power, it must be specifically granted to the federal government. I do know that no one actually cares about the delegation of powers clause, but here it is for all to see: Amendment X: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. I do understand that obviously judges don't really care about chicken shit like this, so the case may be that our government is no longer our legitimate government, and if we are patriots then we may have to do what would be required of patriots if foreign or domestic enemies of the nation have actually succeeded in a treasonous coup. OMG I nearly said the r word.
JD1stTimer Reviewed by JD1stTimer on . Break this defense for me. I have what I think is a bulletproof defense against federal marijuana charges which I believe any judge or jury who gives two cents about the constitution of the United States would be forced to agree with. The eighteenth amendment was ratified in order to outlaw alcohol in the United States. If it could have been legally accomplished by Congress there would have been no amendment for this. The Twenty-First Amendment repealed this amendment, and expressly gave the power to regulate alcohol Rating: 5