Quote Originally Posted by Beefer86
It seems you didnt read the 18th amendment very well. It specifically states liqours.

Section 1. After one year from the ratification of this article the manufacture, sale, or transportation of liquors within, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the United States and all territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited.

Section 1 states specifically of Liqours, I.E. Ethanol, the drinking alcohol. No other drugs.

Section 2. The Congress and the several States shall have concurrent power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

This is just them saying theyll bust yo ass.

Section 3. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of the several States, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the submission hereof to the States by the Congress.

Section 3 is a built in clock.

What the hell is your argument again?

If it is that the 18th amendment implicitly included all drugs because alcohol is no different from drugs the way that newspapers are not different from television, then I want you to try it in the court of law and see how far you will get, because that is a ridiculous argument and will be treated as such.

You claim that a drink containing cannabis would exactly fit the definition of an intoxicating liqour. Incorrect. It exactly fits the definition of an ILLEGAL intoxicating liqour beverage

A non alcohol drink containing marijuana(like Marijuana Tea) is NOT an intoxicating liqour. It is an illegal intoxicating beverage.

Your wording is very confusing and jumbled together. What are you asking?
You beat me to the punch and put it pretty well, so I'll just give ya rep for saving me the time of research. :thumbsup: