If the election is today....

[pisshead]

Ron Paul.

Same here. Ron Paul without a doubt.

[Markass]

You forgot ron paul on your poll. If his name isn't on there, I'm not voting. I wont contribute to the downfall of america by electing mccain or romney..Continued overseas spending is going to result in even more unhappy middle class americans, and this country will continue it's downward spiral by spending the money we don't have.

[8182KSKUSH]

You forgot ron paul on your poll. If his name isn't on there, I'm not voting. I wont contribute to the downfall of america by electing mccain or romney..Continued overseas spending is going to result in even more unhappy middle class americans, and this country will continue it's downward spiral by spending the money we don't have.

I understand what you are saying kind of, but unless you built the computer that you are using from scratch in your garage......get my point. We are waaaaaaaay past the point where it is viable for our country to use an isolationist policy, it won't work and would in fact be far more harmful to everyone in America.

[thcbongman]

If you're going to do a survey like this, you probably shouldn't build a bias right into the survey, like by calling one of the candidates "Hilldog." Not that I support her! But let's be fair.

If you are going to make fun of their names, you should do it on an equal-opportunity basis, maybe like this:

1. Osama
2. Hilldog
3. McPain
4. Mittwit

I don't think they are ALL shit, just Hilldog and Mittwit. Given this pool, I would like to see the race between Osama and McPain, and I would vote for Osama.

True true. I didn't mean to, I'm just so used to calling her hilldog!

[Psycho4Bud]

True true. I didn't mean to, I'm just so used to calling her hilldog!

I put a sticky on this one. I could change up that name for ya if you'd like. As for myself, I think Clinton would be a good choice considering that the others are "last names".

Have a good one!:jointsmile:

[thcbongman]

I put a sticky on this one. I could change up that name for ya if you'd like. As for myself, I think Clinton would be a good choice considering that the others are "last names".

Have a good one!:jointsmile:

Ya, please do since you sticked it, your suggestion is very good. Let's keep it balanced as possible!

[rebgirl420]

Well...

They are all shitty candidates, except for Ron Paul. And even he wasn't 100 percent for me.

However since this is my first chance to vote and i'm a registered Republican I suppose I'd rather have McCain over Romney or Huckabe. Not becuase of his voting stances and such, he's a bit of a liberal sometimes. But because I have to pick someone and I like him as a person.

[Psycho4Bud]

Ya, please do since you sticked it, your suggestion is very good. Let's keep it balanced as possible!

Done.:thumbsup:

Have a good one!:jointsmile:

[thecurious1]

Yeah Mit fucking Romney you weenies. Bring it on! They are all shit if you are a 1 issue voter and that issue is marijuana. But, out of the 4 choices if you put a gun to my head and I had to pick a piece of shit it would be the Mit. He's not a socialist! He has integrity, he IS a leader, he knows his $$, and he would be the best leader for our country of the 4. By far not a "dream candidate", but he is the clear best choice of the 4.

The name thing was funny!
Um.. seriousely this is how it is, NONE NOT ANYONE OF THE CANDIDATES will do squat about marijuana AT ALL. Get over it. I am not basing my vote on any candidates stance, since they ALL, THAT'S RIGHT ALL VIRTUALLY HAVE THE SAME POSITION. Which is, "Ain't gonna happen". It is funny that sooo many people make that "their" issue when selecting a president, not realizing that it is by far and away soo remote that a president HIMself would do ANYTHING directly or that they even could. Therefore I look at "real issues that are relevant and have significant impact on our nation, the land I love.".:thumbsup:

Meh ... seems weird you would be so up tight over cannabis.com users talking about pro-cannabis candidates.

All the republican candidates other than Ron Paul are the "same old thing" .. ALL THREE of them. Same crap, different name. And while I am well aware of how politics work and how much "pull" a president has to legislate ... the fact is that their view CAN make a difference. When was the last time Cannabis came close to being legalized in America? 1976 ... Why? President Carter.

Cannabis law reform IS a big issue to me ... it's a waste of time, money, and needless suffering for non-violent offenders. The money and resources the government would save by ending prohibition are enough to change this country. Not to mention the new industry that would be created, thus stimulating the economy. And the fact that the government is willing to destroy the lives of sick and dying people for using cannabis to relieve themselves of their illness symptoms is absolutely cruel.

Is it the only issue I care about? No .... Is it the most important issue I care about? No .... but is this issue relevant to the website? Yes

[8182KSKUSH]

Meh ... seems weird you would be so up tight over cannabis.com users talking about pro-cannabis candidates.

Is there a pro cannabis candidate? Was there I mean? (If you consider that a legit run for the presidency, it's more like a tradition, a traditition is something that happens over and over again, more of the same?) I was unaware, please who is the pro cannabis candidate?

All the republican candidates other than Ron Paul are the "same old thing" .. ALL THREE of them. Same crap, different name. And while I am well aware of how politics work and how much "pull" a president has to legislate ... the fact is that their view CAN make a difference. When was the last time Cannabis came close to being legalized in America? 1976 ... Why? President Carter.

And ironically, he is argueabally the worst or one of the 2 worst presidents ever in history. Sorry though, I don't subscribe to the idea that Ron Paul is anything more than a fucking cartoon. Please there are lots of posts about this already.

Cannabis law reform IS a big issue to me ... it's a waste of time, money, and needless suffering for non-violent offenders. The money and resources the government would save by ending prohibition are enough to change this country. Not to mention the new industry that would be created, thus stimulating the economy. And the fact that the government is willing to destroy the lives of sick and dying people for using cannabis to relieve themselves of their illness symptoms is absolutely cruel.

Hey good for you. My brother might go to federal ass pounding prison over it. Yeah it's important to me too.

Is it the only issue I care about? No .... Is it the most important issue I care about? No .... but is this issue relevant to the website? Yes

Yes it is relevant, however that has nothing to do with Ron Paul and whether or not I buy his bridge. And if I think Ron Paul is full of shit, that doesn't mean that I don't care about or am not passionate about prohibition. Just means that I don't agree with you.:S4:

Does that about cover it?:jointsmile: