Thanks for the intended rep, lol.
I have nothing against responsible dissent. Same with responsible journalism. But when dissenting journalists are only interested in advancing their cause, we all sufer from an overflowing of emotion they have purposefully manipulated to elict a trained response. The more devout their sect, when one is confronted with the truth, they become incredulous, insolent and defensive, side-stepping to another pissy theory. (How is Dan Rather, anyway?)

Sounds like a Times front page collection ya got there. Remarkably no mention of the faux paws the democrats have been fiddling with. Rep. William Jefferson, Norman Hsu, Whitewater, Monica...?
All governments have their problems. But damn sure, the way to solve the problems isn't to subvert them, but understand the nature of the problem. When there are problems found in certain areas of the government, doesn't make sence to tear it all down.
To correct a child that hits another child, you don't punish them all, and say "one's bad, they're all bad".
Or do you...?


Quote Originally Posted by wickerbill
when was the last time you were attacked by "terrorists"?
How often do you think we should be attacked?
And if Ft. Dix had suceeded? You don't think there's others? lol


Gotta run, wife want's computer.