Wonder if this is happpening elsewhere.

[epxroot]

UPDATE - Sutton ZERO vote anomaly - Ron Paul Forums

epxroot Reviewed by epxroot on 01-09-2008. Wonder if this is happpening elsewhere. UPDATE - Sutton ZERO vote anomaly - Ron Paul Forums Rating: 5

[angry nomad]

YouTube - Did Ron Paul Win New Hampshire?

Looks like Ron Paul won, with Tancredo in second if you look at the results posted here town by town, but when you scroll to the bottom the numbers literally do not add up.

Now they changed their website to show McCain winning. Did The Boston Globe make a huge mistake in their journalism, or did they accidentally report the truth?

I am glad I saved and uploaded this to youtube. Hopefully youtube does not delete my video.

YouTube - Ron Paul - Now The Boston Globe Changed Their Story
The Boston Globe's website, Boston.com just last showed Ron Paul or Tom Tancredo winning every town, but the totals did not makes sense.

Now they changed it.

They do not even mention Ron Paul on their "New Hampshire Primary Candidate Tracker".

Are they biased against Ron Paul? Even more importantly, was their any voter fraud at the New Hampshire election? We need a recount of the PAPER ballots.

[Zimzum]

I hope this gets looked into by the NH GOP or the FEC. 31 votes here... X votes there.. etc could add up. I doubt a recount will net Ron a win but the fact even one vote is miscounted or "missing" just goes to discredit the legitimacy of our elections.

[epxroot]

Here is more info regarding possible voter fraud.

Hand Count Shows 15% For Ron Paul | Ron Paul War Room

[epxroot]

I am starting to think that there is something fishy going on not because I support Dr. Paul but because I am reading arguments about Obama not getting all his votes counted.

[swice1]

Ron Paul Votes Not Counted In New Hampshire District

I already lost hope for the government.. every thing's already figured out for us don't worry! the government will choose the next president for us, as always.

[Psycho4Bud]

Ron Paul Votes Not Counted In New Hampshire District

I already lost hope for the government.. every thing's already figured out for us don't worry! the government will choose the next president for us, as always.

"Diebold machines aid Giuliani, Romney".........Good ol' Alex Jones. LMAO!! SURE did help out Rudy didn't it? PART of the reason why Ron Paul isn't taken seriously IS his affiliations with the conspiracy sites; A.J. is doing him NO favors here.

Have a good one!:jointsmile:

[epxroot]

"Diebold machines aid Giuliani, Romney".........Good ol' Alex Jones. LMAO!! SURE did help out Rudy didn't it? PART of the reason why Ron Paul isn't taken seriously IS his affiliations with the conspiracy sites; A.J. is doing him NO favors here.

Have a good one!:jointsmile:

A.J is not the only one saying this. My post was not from any A.J site.

[Psycho4Bud]

IF this has any validity wouldn't Ron Paul have made a statement? When/if he does then I'll put a bit of worth on the story. Conspiracy sites are his best friend.....seems damn funny that Ron hasn't made a statement.

Have a good one!:s4:

[pisshead]

New Hampshire District Admits Ron Paul Votes Not Counted
Sutton township reported Congressman had zero votes, actual number was 31 Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, January 9, 2008

[align=left]The head clerk of the New Hampshire town of Sutton has been forced to admit that Ron Paul received 31 votes yet when the final amount was transferred to a summary sheet and sent out to the media, the total was listed as zero. The fiasco throws the entire primary into doubt and could lead to a re-count.
As we reported earlier today, an entire family voted for Ron Paul in Sutton, yet when the voting map on the Politico website was posted, the total votes for Ron Paul were zero.
Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming "human error" was responsible for the mistake.
Two or three votes not counted could be a plausible mistake - but 31 votes for one candidate? [/align]
"The classic method for rigging a hand count is to write the wrong number on the form," Harris told the Alex Jones Show.
"They are counting everything in public real nice, they fill out a form in public real nice and then they transfer it to another form and they call that a summary sheet and then that is the one they send in," explained Harris.
"What happened is she said they did not transfer the number correctly and put zero instead of 31 - that is unacceptable as an answer."
With 100% of precincts now reporting, the map originally listed zero votes for Ron Paul as you can see below. It has now been updated to reflect the 31 votes Paul actually received.
[align=left] The remainder of the 31 people in Sutton who voted for Ron Paul need to go public immediately with the charge of vote fraud and make it known that they were cheated out of their right to vote.
Harris estimates that it could cost the Ron Paul campaign as much as $67,000 dollars for a recount, but such a move could throw the entire primary into doubt, especially in light of the fact that Barack Obama appears to have been cheated out of a win by Hillary Clinton.[/align]